Ask Jerry: Why does iMessage need to support RCS?
Let's talk about tech.
Welcome to Ask Jerry, where we talk about any and all the questions you might have about the smart things in your life. I'm Jerry, and I have spent the better part of my life working with tech. I have a background in engineering and R&D and have been covering Android and Google for the past 15 years.
Ask Jerry is a column where we answer your burning Android/tech questions with the help of long-time Android Central editor Jerry Hildenbrand.
I'm also really good at researching data about everything — that's a big part of our job here at Android Central — and I love to help people (another big part of our job!). If you have questions about your tech, I'd love to talk about them.
Email me at askjerryac@gmail.com, and I'll try to get things sorted out. You can remain anonymous if you like, and we promise we're not sharing anything we don't cover here.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Why does iMessage need to support RCS?
Ryan asks:
I have an iPhone and keep hearing about RCS support. I know it's coming but I don't know why it matters? Why is it so important?
Thanks
Be an expert in 5 minutes
Get the latest news from Android Central, your trusted companion in the world of Android
Hi Ryan, and thanks for the great question! With so much talk about how Apple is supporting RCS messaging, very little of it explains why.
The answer is twofold. On one hand, you have the benefits of RCS over SMS—and there are quite a few. The other reason, and maybe the most important one, is a little weird and is all about market share.
The benefits of RCS over SMS matter to a lot of people. RCS is the current standard for most telecom companies and has replaced SMS services. Since the standards are "loosely" enforced and applied, many companies like Google have stepped in and improved them.
Basically, RCS is just like iMessage. You have rich messaging with support for much larger media files, read receipts, stickers, and everything else that comes with a service like iMessage or WhatsApp.
With Google's version—which is supported by every Android phone—you can add full encryption into the mix. the only person who can read your message is the person you're sending it to. Hopefully, Apple will implement RCS in a compatible way because this is really the best feature.
Right now, when you, as an iPhone user, message someone with an Android phone and see a green bubble, nothing is being encrypted—your messages or the ones you receive. It's not easy to intercept a message and read it, but it's not impossible and the instructions are out there so anyone who is a little bit computer savvy can do it.
You should want your messages end-to-end encrypted, no matter who you're talking to. With RCS, you can have that; both chats with one person and group chats.
Here's the weird part—this really only matters in places like North America where people use SMS. About half the people in the U.S. and Canada use an iPhone while the other half use an Android phone. This is very different than most everywhere else and once you head abroad you'll see that almost everyone uses an Android phone.
When half the people are talking to the other half, making messaging work great for both halves is important.
You would think this is even more important in places where most people use an Android phone. Apple doesn't want to be the only reason why chats and messages are unencrypted in a place like France or Indonesia. This is true, but one thing makes a big difference—very few people outside North America use iMessage, SMS, or RCS.
WhatsApp rules the roost once you venture outside of North America. There are various reasons for this, but in the end, WhatsApp offers everything RCS does, and as long as you have a data connection, it's free. People around the world have been enjoying the experience Apple and Google have been working to build for years, thanks to WhatsApp.
No message service is perfect. Once Apple adopts its version of RCS, it won't fix everything, either. But Apple and Google have to work together to build a secure and rich first-party messaging service that works everywhere, and supporting RCS goes a long way toward that goal.
Jerry is an amateur woodworker and struggling shade tree mechanic. There's nothing he can't take apart, but many things he can't reassemble. You'll find him writing and speaking his loud opinion on Android Central and occasionally on Twitter.
-
CajunMoses WhatsApp offers everything RCS does, and as long as you have a data connection, it's free.
I seldom ever use WhatsApp. But, when I need to, I use my browser to connect to https://web.whatsapp.com/ over Wi-Fi. Most people use the term, "data connection," to refer to Internet & messaging service for phones only. So the sentence suggests that you possibly can't use WhatsApp for free over Wi-Fi. And it also suggests that there is a paid WhatsApp service that doesn't require either Wi-Fi or a phone data connection service. I would have simply said, "it's free," and omitted the part about, "as long as ...." -
Village_Idiot I'm not sure what the author meant by "as long as you have a data connection, it's free." It seems he is conflating the cost of data and Whatsapp usage. Whatsapp is free regardless of the type of connection. It doesn't matter if you are using WiFi, 5G, or LTE, Whatsapp is free. The data usage may or may not be free. But that is the same with RCS and iMessage. Both are free services, it is the data connection that may or may not be free.Reply -
kiniku Makes complete sense...."Apple doesn't want to be the only reason why chats and messages are unencrypted in a place like France or Indonesia."Reply -
Village_Idiot
Yeah. He seemed to be all over the place. I guess he was afraid to say, "in a place like Iran or China."kiniku said:Makes complete sense...."Apple doesn't want to be the only reason why chats and messages are unencrypted in a place like France or Indonesia." -
SnowyRVulpix
Wasn't there a story recently about Apple getting into trouble in one of those types of countries for encrypting messages during some kind of civil crisis?Village_Idiot said:Yeah. He seemed to be all over the place. I guess he was afraid to say, "in a place like Iran or China." -
eng3 How about Google "get the message" and add RCS support to Google voice or merge it into messages.Reply
I signed up for GV years ago when txt were still 15cents a msg. Now I'm vested into that phone number but don't want to throw away my original number -
SyCoREAPER
Irrelevant comment and port your number out if it's that's important. Google Voice isn't a priority for Google and likely won't be. With their struggle to catch up on AI that will be their first and foremost attention slot followed by Android, Chrome and Chrome OS respectively.eng3 said:How about Google "get the message" and add RCS support to Google voice or merge it into messages.
I signed up for GV years ago when txt were still 15cents a msg. Now I'm vested into that phone number but don't want to throw away my original number
As for the author, I'm not going to bother clicking that link and hope that is rhetorical. If not, we'll, there are other areas in tech to cover. -
Village_Idiot
I get what you're saying. I'm not sure I would like merging GV and GM though. I like the fact that I have a separate GV number that I can give out to acquaintances that I'm not comfortable with giving my phone# to. It also comes in handy if I am travelling outside the US or using it for online shopping. If I start getting sketchy stuff coming on that line, I can just get a new number without having to get a new Google account.eng3 said:How about Google "get the message" and add RCS support to Google voice or merge it into messages.
I signed up for GV years ago when txt were still 15cents a msg. Now I'm vested into that phone number but don't want to throw away my original number
It would be nice for Google to add end-to-end encryption to GV though. -
eng3
How is it an irrelevant comment? Just irrelevant to you. If you read my message and understood Google voice, you'd know that porting isn't a solution unless I buy a second line. And I'm not going to throw away my number.SyCoREAPER said:Irrelevant comment and port your number out if it's that's important. Google Voice isn't a priority for Google and likely won't be. With their struggle to catch up on AI that will be their first and foremost attention slot followed by Android, Chrome and Chrome OS respectively.
As for the author, I'm not going to bother clicking that link and hope that is rhetorical. If not, we'll, there are other areas in tech to cover.
Obviously Google voice isn't a priority for Google, just as RCS isn't a priority for Apple.
Google shouldn't be complaining about others not supporting RCS when it's not even supported fully on their own products.
When I say merge, I didn't mean merge numbers. I mean merge app functions. Like if you had dual sim and made GV look like another SIM. I thought there was a web interface for Google messages too. I also like being able to use GV overseas. Merging apps can simplify maintenance and support but it's not like they are really maintaining Google voice.Village_Idiot said:I get what you're saying. I'm not sure I would like merging GV and GM though. I like the fact that I have a separate GV number that I can give out to acquaintances that I'm not comfortable with giving my phone# to. It also comes in handy if I am travelling outside the US or using it for online shopping. If I start getting sketchy stuff coming on that line, I can just get a new number without having to get a new Google account.
It would be nice for Google to add end-to-end encryption to GV though. -
Village_Idiot
I know what you meant by merging functions. I don't foresee Google merging them any time soon. It would take a lot of back-end work to get Google Messages to support RCS for both VOIP and non-VOIP numbers. Furthermore, according to Google, Google Voice is encrypted:eng3 said:When I say merge, I didn't mean merge numbers. I mean merge app functions. Like if you had dual sim and made GV look like another SIM. I thought there was a web interface for Google messages too. I also like being able to use GV overseas. Merging apps can simplify maintenance and support but it's not like they are really maintaining Google voice.
https://support.google.com/voice/answer/10464820?hl=en#:~:text=Data%20is%20encrypted%20in%20transit,are%20synced%20across%20your%20devices.
Your content is stored securelyWhen you send and receive text messages and attachments on Google Voice, they’re stored securely in our world-class data centers. Data is encrypted in transit from a Google Voice client to Google, and when stored at rest.
When you record a voicemail greeting on Google Voice, or when you leave a voicemail for others, your audio data is stored.
Texts, calls, and voicemails are synced across your devices. You can delete text messages, calls, or voicemails.
Your Google Account comes with built-in security designed to detect and block threats like spam, phishing and malware. Your activity is stored using strong industry standards and practices.
They are maintaining Google Voice (at least I think they are). I don't think they are doing it through Play Store though. Every once in a while, I get a notification on my phone and tablet saying, Google Voice is being updated.
Although I allow would like for Google to merge the apps, I'm also not a fan of the "one app does everything" concept. But that is a whole different discussion.
As far as web interface, yes there is one: https://messages.google.com.